| Melchizedek and Yeshua are they the same person? | |
|
Who was this Melchizedek, whom Abraham honored and acknowledged; to whom Abraham gave a tithe of all he had gained in battle? Then he is mentioned again in Psalm 110, which is clearly speaking of the Messiah (Yeshua?) that will come to reign on the earth; and that this Messiah will judge the nations on the day of the Lord.
Why is the priesthood of Melchizedek special and why does it last forever? In the New Testament, the entire 7th chapter of the book of Hebrews is devoted to the priesthood of Yeshua, and to the Melchizedek connection. There are some very interesting details in Hebrews 7, which clue us into who Melchizedek was, and together with this matrix, I believe this mystery has been solved. Melchizedek is Yeshua! He is the second in the trinity, the righteousness of Yahweh, which is Yeshua. Here are some of the basics: If you look at his name or title, Melchizedek (Melkhey-Tsedek) is translated as King of Righteousness. Who could be king of righteousness, but Yeshua our Messiah? Melchizedek was the king of Shalem, which is king of peace. Yeshua is known as the prince of peace. Who could be king of peace over Yeshua? No one! Melchizedek was without father or mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life. Who could this be said of, other than God himself? No one! Melchizedek has an indestructible life and abides a priest perpetually. No human could fit this bill. And could there be two who abide as a priest to God forever (a man and also Yeshua)? It was also said that Melchizedek was made in the image or likeness of the Son of God. This could be taken as the image of the son of God (the second in the trinity) or as the image of the begotten son of God, when the Lord took on a fleshly body. But they are one and the same.
Interestingly, there is a Dead Sea scroll that identifies Melchizedek as the one who will carry out the vengeance of God's judgments and the one who delivers the people from the hand of Belial and the spirits of his lot. Here is a translation for those who are interested.
The above excerpt from the Dead Sea Scrolls, reveals the same future duties for Melchizedek, that the New Testament reveals for Yeshua (Jesus). The matrix report and matrix below show that they are the same person.
Click here for original matrix image (it's large).
Related Articles:
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email this
Hits: 603 Trackback(0)
Comments (2)
  written by lakeshore, February 21, 2010
What I would like to know is why YHVH is typically written in all capital letters (and "LORD" of he old testament too), and what relationship, if any, this has in today's world where corporations, and corporate administrative government, are written in all capital letters. Something written in all caps at law is a dead entity. Is God dead? And what is a matrix? I have heard from Dezert Owl on The Real Public Radio, that the term matrix is of the "mother", the "womb", a feminine term, and from Freeman that what the NWO has done is to kill the mother and corporotized it, and from Jordan Maxwell that our physical bodies are considered corporations by the Vatican, and from the Mormon church that the Levitical and Aaronic priesthoods of the old testament to prepare people for the Malchisedek priesthood, and I have heard that the movie "The Matrix" was called what it was as a reference to us living dead feminine corporate lives. God said in Exodus "My name is jealous and I am a jealous God". I have heard from Dezert Owl, that God is in fact a combination of masculine and feminine components. The spiritual, or unseen, is considered the masculine. On the other hand, the (E=mc2) energy-matter-time matrix of the universe is considered the feminine. In the lore of the messiah, it is my understanding that it is generally understood that upon his death he fulfilled the mosaic law. He promised to pay the debt for all our sins so that we may find everlasting glory, sins generally being of the flesh, and perhaps fleshly thoughts of the mind who's energy is not of the spirit. But this does not solve the issue of why God is called LORD in all caps, and introduced himself to Israel as the jealous all capital YHVH just before imposing the law upon them http://www.bible.ca/jw-YHWH.htm Is YHVH in fact supposed to be considered as the jealous physical dead (all caps) feminine component of God, representing death of the physical or death of the flesh (or all that is seen), and not God the father? Was the law imposed by the mother because the fleshly sins of Israel are of what is considered to be the physical or feminine? Is the real father of the Malchisedek like Yeshua and Moses. Is Yeshua in fact the father, as well as the son, and perhaps the holy spirit too? Is the LORD or YHVH actually the mother and of the physical creation? Moses was of the Malchisedek Priesthood, but the mosaic law in my understanding was carried out by aaron and the levitical priesthoods. If the Malchisedek Priesthood is of the father, is the purpose of the dead feminine matrix womb of the NWO similar to the levitical and aaronic priesthoods? To prepare us for the Malchisedek Preisthood of god the father?
written by Ant, February 26, 2010
YHWH or YHVH (with V=W) is capitalised as I think I read somewhere a while back that Hebrews use only capitals. Agree with what u say about corporate soles. Also, the YHWH are actually called vowels. Also it is written backwards, so English is back-to-front & some say the language was changed to muck up our thinking. Why not write it as u say it? Hebrews added what we call vowels when reading the language. So YHWH is not as its written but Yahweh or Yahwah (as in the breath of life). I have never seen anyone write it so. Also look up what God means. See Isa 65:11 for a clue. What does “fulfil” mean in scripture about fulfilling the law? Does not mean it is done away with. Maybe it was filled to the full. The law stands as it is. Some things have been changed, like the priesthood (See Heb) but generally all remains. One that is changed is that there are not to be any sacrifices as He was our ultimate & final sacrifice. The debt of sin was paid, but firstly we have to accept that sacrifice & also we need to be clear that we are sinful anyway. We are of the flesh, hence sinful. (Rom 7:25; 1Pet 4:1; Rom 3:20). LORD is another story. LORD is BAAL in Canaanite (I think). Hence we can also say it is a derogatory term, but it also means Lord as in master. So the argument is why have this word be a problem, when our Father was probably called Baal before it became the word for a false-god. Not sure about this, it like the modern usage of the word jew. Our Saviour was not a jew as such. Its like saying Canadians were also there at that time. Close enough spelling to cannanite, but not the same. Judahites were the race. Most of us are a breed now not a race or nation in the scriptural sense of the word. Saying He introduced Himself as the all-caps is a stretch, as u can't take the spelling in modern copyrighted books as being the way He presented himself. The names & things have changed since someone wrote them down. The last part of your bit is intriguing. Unless we can see some scriptural proof of this we can only pretend to be philosophers & assume we know a lot of what we don’t.
Write comment
|
Like this? Share it with your friends!
TrackBack URI for this entry
Show/hide comment form
